Related articles

• CELEX:62025CB0874: Case C-874/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 June 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-290/23, MeSoFa v SRB (Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
• CELEX:62024CB0860: Case C-860/24, Brambandi: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio – Italy) – HJ v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Right to practise the profession of specialised academic support teacher in the host Member State – Qualification awarded in the Member State of origin – Qualification not entitling the holder to practise the profession of specialised academic support teacher in the Member State of origin – Recognition in the host Member State)
• CELEX:62025TB0407: Case T-407/25: Order of the General Court of 18 June 2026 –Biofa v Commission (Action for annulment – Plant protection products – Basic substance sodium hydrogen carbonate – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2069 – Amendment of the review report for sodium hydrogen carbonate – Partial withdrawal of the approval of sodium hydrogen carbonate as a basic substance – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)
• CELEX:62026CN0409: Case C-409/26, Sijberg: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 28 April 2026 – WD v Belgische Staat / Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën
• CELEX:62026TN0358: Case T-358/26: Action brought on 5 June 2026 – Ethical Capital Partners v Commission
• CELEX:62026CN0449: Case C-449/26, Freie Hansestadt Bremen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgerichts der Freien Hansestadt Bremen (Germany) lodged on 6 May 2026 – UQ v Freie Hansestadt Bremen
• CELEX:62025CN0569: Case C-569/25, Alcker: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 August 2025 – X (Appellant 1), X (Appellant 2) v Minister van Asiel en Migratie
• CELEX:62025TB0327: Case T-327/25: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2026 – Usmanov v Council
• CELEX:62026CN0455: Case C-455/26, Keramik: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Višje sodišče v Kopru (Slovenia) lodged on 7 May 2026 – KERAMIK IN ZAKLJUČNA GRADBENA DELA, TB, s.p. v WORK4YOU, gradbeništvo, trgovina, inženiring in storitve, d.o.o.
• CELEX:62025CA0342: Case C-342/25, Stogenchev: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against DS, KW (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against corruption involving officials of Member States of the European Union – Passive corruption – Exclusion of evidence obtained in a flawed manner – Exculpatory evidence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – First and second paragraphs of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Right to an effective remedy – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Arti
• CELEX:62024CA0903: Case C-903/24, Zmarka: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – DJ and PJ v Santander Bank Polska S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency and containing unfair terms – Effects of the finding that a contractual term is unfair – Void agreement – Actions for restitution – Consumer’s right to default interest at the statutory rate on amounts to be repaid by the seller or supplier – National case-law requiring the payment of default interest at the statutory rate from the date on which the demand for payment was served ind
• CELEX:62025CA0216: Case C-216/25, GSP Offshore: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa – Romania) – ZN v GSP Offshore SRL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Directive 2001/23/EC – Article 3(1) – Transfer to the transferee of the obligations arising from a contract of employment existing on the date of the transfer of the undertaking – Option for Member States to provide for the joint and several liability of the transferor and the transferee – Article 8 – Application of national provisions more favourable to employees – Transfer of the obligation to pay salary entitlements not paid by the transferor – Possibility of applying a
• CELEX:62025CA0069: Case C-69/25 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 June 2026 – Laurent Merlin, Stéphane Pinto, Gaëtan Delsart, Gaëtan Baillet, Jean-Yves Noël, Christophe Lhomel, Jérémy Lhomel, Stéphane Fournier, Alexandre Fournier, Christian Dubois, Franck Nowe, Jean-Pierre Deparis, Frédéric Drogerys, Jean-Marie Baheu, Jonathan Delsart, José Pinto, Mathieu Pinto, Olivier Leprêtre, Josse Martin, Lionel Descharles, Loïc Merlin, Philippe Calone, Sébastien Leprêtre, Philippe Mahieu, Andries Visser, Charles Lines, Paul Lines, Low Impact Fishers of Europe (LIFE) v European Commission (Appeal – Action for failure to act – Article 265 TFEU – Common fisheries policy – Funding for shipowners fishing with beam trawl using electrical pulse current – Complaint – Concept of definition of a
• CELEX:62026TN0347: Case T-347/26: Action brought on 22 May 2026 – Tkach v Council
• CELEX:62026TN0382: Case T-382/26: Action brought on 18 June 2026 – TY v Commission
• CELEX:62025CA0292: Case C-292/25, shopping24: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz – Austria) – shopping24 Gesellschaft für multimediale Anwendung v SR, as insolvency administrator for Sportgigant Lindpointner GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Insolvency proceedings – Regulation (EU) 2015/848 – Article 3(1) – International jurisdiction – Article 6(1) – Action which derives directly from insolvency proceedings and is closely linked with them – Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State within the territory of which insolvency proceedings have been opened)
• CELEX:62026CN0602: Case C-602/26, ENAC and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 15 April 2026 – Autorità di regolazione dei trasporti v Vueling Airlines SA, UR, Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile (ENAC)
• CELEX:62026TN0379: Case T-379/26: Action brought on 15 June 2026 – UF v Commission
• CELEX:62025CB0875: Case C-875/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 June 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-291/23, MeSoFa v SRB (Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
• CELEX:62024CA0081: Case C-81/24, Jenec: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrajno sodišče v Mariboru – Slovenia) – LH v OTP banka d.d., formerly NOVA KREDITNA BANKA MARIBOR (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Financial services – Access to a payment account with basic features – Directive 2014/92/EU – Article 16(4) – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Consumer included on the list of the United States Office of Foreign Assets Control – Refusal to open such a payment account)